|
|
|
|
|
Need Pro Sound or Pro A/V gear? Call Daniella or John Karr 888 545 8271 Most Major Pro Audio Brands! International shipping! Great Prices! Looking for a Rat Sound Hoodie, stickers, shirts of more, check out the Rat swag |
![]() |
Friday, January 22. 2010Chasing GremlinsTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I've been enjoying your series of posts on your headphone quest, I have 2 short questions if I could pick your brain for a moment. Many guys stick with headphones for years in the same way that many studio guys still mix only on NS10s. Do you feel it's more important to find headphones that deliver the best possible sound or simply develop an intimate knowledge of what you're using so that you know how it's going treat the incoming signal?
Second, have you found any headphones that score high on noise isolation?
Hmmm, Hello Jeremy!
Well, balancing familiarity with using a tool that offers the most accurate response is a trade off. I would say that using the most accurate tool possible is the way to go and when switching, bring both for a while to acclimate.
Sony V6's are pretty good cans for tame signals, though I find that they lack the upper highs and if I cue up a sub synthesizer I get nothing useful. I personally want headphones that have a frequency range comparable to what I can get out of a top PA rig. I will gladly work on ear training to acclimate to a new set.
As far as isolation, I know that is high on many sound engineer's list of assets. I personally feel having accuracy is more important as I find my most critical listening is done during set changes. During the actual show, I have the PA sound as my main reference and I use headphones more for troubleshooting so tonal perfection and isolation are secondary.
hi, dave
the direct sound ex-29 headphones seem to be comming more popular in the live sound world. i know your budget is limited, but is there a way to add these to your test phones? i would really like to know how these stand against those tested so far.
thank you for this thread. as always... very interesting. :)
Hmm, would love to test them. My primary goal is flat sound, isolation is secondary. From what I am reading about them isolation is primary and flat sound is secondary.
Being that finding flat sound is so darn difficult even with headphones with flat sound as the primary focus, I have not set my sights on cans with flat sound as their secondary focus yet. That said, if anyone want to send me some would love to test them and will return them in perfect shape with a free rat shirt and some rat stickers
I wanted to ask you a question about the Denon AH-D2000's. When I saw a previous post on the frequency response of those cans, I saw major discrepencies in the range of the cans (i.e. the noticeable "Hi-Fi" sound, having the low end boosted a little, then the drop off in mid and high ranges). But when I watched the video with the same cans, they actually seemed pretty flat. Are we to say that they are finally contenders, or is it just the way you were testing them. I am considering buying a pair, and I wanted to know your opinion.
I switched mics to a mic with a smaller diameter for the video and was getting a bit better readings. The measurement methods I am using are pretty crude so there is some variation in the readings but given the fact that many of the headphones I am testing are so far off base, the method seems to be good enough to narrow things down.
The Denon's are definitely final contenders.
|
Links to Things of CuriousnessCalendar
QuicksearchArchivesCategories
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||